Mid 2022 I became the owner of a Holden Combo van. I knew that if the Department of Transport [ABN 27 285 643 255] did not have a record of the transfer of the car, the enforcers of the Department of Transport policies AKA the WESTERN AUSTRALIA POLICE [ABN 91 724 684 688] would steal my private property by way of impounding and extort money from my Estate by way of prosecution and fines.

Schedule 2—The Australian Consumer Law
21  Unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services
            (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce, in connection with:
                    (a) the supply or possible supply of goods or services to a person; or
                    (b) the acquisition or possible acquisition of goods or services from a person; engage in conduct that is, in all the circumstances, unconscionable.

COMPETITION AND CONSUMER ACT 2010 – SCHEDULE 2

Out of necessity and under duress I filled out a transfer form and sent it off to the DOT.

As a result Peter Woronzow, the Director General and CEO of the Department of Transport authorised a memorial to be placed over my property through the Fines Enforcement Registry and BAYCORP (Sheriff).

I had no option but to challenge this matter in court. I contacted the Fines Enforcement Registry to challenge the fine knowing that by paying a fine is an admission of guilt. The Fines Enforcement Registry notified the Department of Transport that I was challenging their claim and had ‘Elected to go to Court’.

The Department of Transport had two options, they could drop the case or proceed with legal action that is considered to be a criminal prosecution.

Peter Woronzow chose to proceed in court with a criminal prosecution!

Third time unlucky

The Department of Transport lawyer Ms Veloo had three attempts at a trial, which in and of itself is an unfair with an extreme bias towards the Department of Transport. I can assure you that if ‘we’ the ‘Accused’ were not prepared then we would not get a second chance, let alone a third!

My Opening Address to the Court

We are here today because the prosecution alleges that we have committed the purported crime of ‘Failure to apply for transfer of a vehicle licence within 28 days after issue of notice under s.10(3)(b) ROAD TRAFFIC (VEHICLES) ACT 2012.

The prosecution must prove that we did not pay the tax/duty for the Holden Combo Van by way of a postal order to the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT [ABN 27 285 643 255] s.10(3)(b) ROAD TRAFFIC (VEHICLES) ACT 2012 within 28 days;

The prosecution must prove our intention to not apply and pay for a transfer of a vehicle licence;

And the prosecution must prove that the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT did not refuse payment of legal tender by way of a postal order;

The prosecution must prove that the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT [ABN 27 285 643 255] have the authority to interfere with a private contract between myself and another party being the seller of the Holden Combo Van. We have not seen nor heard evidence that we are not subject to the laws of contract including but not limited to the CORPORATIONS ACT 2001, FAIR TRADING ACT 1973 etc.

The prosecution must prove that the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT [ABN 27 285 643 255] has the authority to issue and demand a tax/duty in the first place;

The prosecution must prove the validity of the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT’s claim that the ROAD TRAFFIC (VEHICLES) ACT 2012 applies to me as a Divine living sentient woman of Soul;

The prosecution must prove the physical elements of mens rea (guilty mind) and actus reus (guilty action) with the intention to defraud the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT [ABN 27 285 643 255].